Run Apache NiFi Cluster in Docker with SSL Enabled
For added security, if HTTPS connection is enabled, Apache NiFi will verify the Hostname of requests. Therefore each request sent to Apache NiFi must have a predefined hostname. Not only the external requests, but peer-to-peer communication of NiFi nodes in a cluster also go through HTTPS and are subject to hostname verification. If the hostname provided in the HTTPS request does not match the hostname defined in the SSL certificate, NiFi will throw a javax.net.ssl.SSLPeerUnverifiedException.
Run Apache NiFi in Docker with SSL Enabled
Run Apache NiFi Cluster in Docker
The last article on Apache NiFi: Run Apache NiFi in Docker was for those who want to start playing with Apache NiFi. Though it was a good start to play with NiFi, it is far from production deployment. This article introduces the second stage of deployment: a NiFi cluster running in Docker using Docker Compose.
To begin with, you must have Docker installed in your system and also install Docker Compose as we are going to use Docker Compose to setup the Apache NiFi cluster.
Log4J 2.17.0 is Vulnerable to RCE. Upgrade to 2.17.1
I know the wish list of all Java developers for Santa starts with "No more Log4J vulnerabilities". However sometimes even Santa cannot fulfill all your wishes. A new security vulnerability was found in Log4J 2.0-alpha7 to 2.17.0 excluding 2.3.2 and 2.12.4.
The new vulnerability allows Remote Code Execution (RCE) attack where an attacker with permission to modify the logging configuration file can construct a malicious configuration using a JDBC Appender with a data source referencing a JNDI URI which can execute remote code.
Unlike the CVE-2021-44228 that triggered the domino effect of Log4J vulnerabilities, CVE-2021-44832 is marked as a moderated risk since it requires access to your Log4J configuration. For those who don't know, projects using Log4J with the CVE-2021-44228 vulnerability can be exploited by submitting modified HTTP requests. On the other hand, CVE-2021-44832 requires direct access to the Log4J configuration for an outsider. If somebody got the access to your system to modify the Log4J configuration, you are already doomed. Therefore, you may not need to rush to apply the patch if your system is already secure enough.
The CVE-2021-44832 issue particularly hasn't affect Log4J 1.x versions. However, Log4J 1.x is not maintained anymore and do not expect any security patches in case if a security vulnerability is found in the future. Based on Java versions, upgrade to the latest version with the fix for all known security vulnerabilities so far.
| Java Version | Latest Log4J Version |
|---|---|
| Java 8 and later | Log4j 2.17.1 |
| Java 7 | Log4j 2.12.4 |
| Java 6 | Log4j 2.3.2 |
The latest Log4J versions in the above table have fixed the issue by limiting JNDI data source names to the java protocol.
Let me repeat
the process for developers to identify the vulnerable Log4J versions.
Run
the following command from your project folder.
mvn dependency:tree
Any Log4J dependency with a version less than 2.17.1 is most likely vulnerable or unmaintained. Maven central repository has a new column with the number of vulnerabilities in each Log4j version.
If you encounter any vulnerable Log4j versions as your direct dependencies defined in your pom file, or in your parent pom file, upgrade them immediately. Remember by defining the following dependency in your pom file, you can override the dependency defined in your parent pom file.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.logging.log4j</groupId>
<artifactId>log4j-core</artifactId>
<version>2.17.1</version>
</dependency>
